Background & aim: Hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelets syndrome (HELLP) was mimicked by several infectious Conditions. It is critically important to distinguish these two, since their management and course differs, substantially. Case report: The case was a 27-year-old gravid patient with gestational age of 30 weeks who initially presented with headache and lower limb pain as well as leukopenia (and lymphopenia), normochromic normocytic anemia, thrombocytopenia, abnormal liver enzymes, increased lactate dehydrogenase enzyme and C-reactive protein. The patient was initially managed for HELLP syndrome, but due to the atypical presentation (low blood pressure and an episode of delirium when admitted), the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), realtime reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) was requested for the patient that was positive. The spiral lung high-resolution computed tomography scan revealed changes compatible with COVID-19 diagnosis. Finally, the patient underwent uncomplicated normal vaginal delivery at 39th gestational week. Conclusion: It is important to consider the COVID-19 in differential diagnosis of patients suspected to HELLP syndrome, as the isolation and treatment of the patient is different and time-sensitive.

Relationship of civil servants and political authorities and sphere of powers of both in administration and policy-making is one of main issues of the contemporary governance. There is no doubt that politics is not administration and a politician is different with a public servant. Therefore, it seems there is no problem to distinguish politics from administration. Nevertheless, specification of exact boundaries of the two spheres and its cause is not clear. This dichotomy is not founded on a priori logic; but it is a fact in the most of modern states. Therefore, in view of conceptual, institutional and individual actors, there is a separation as well as Overlapping between politics and administration that being debated in the article with a descriptive method. According to author, norms specified at a democratic constitution and emphasis it gives to values such as justice, democracy, responsibility, autonomy and morality provides sufficient evidences for keeping this demarcation and simultaneously makes an interaction between the two spheres. Although the way of demarcating and specification of points of distinction, Overlapping and interaction between the two spheres of 'governing and service' depends on characteristics of constitutionalism and administrative tradition of states.

The present research studied the (causal, contextual, and intervening) Conditions, strategies, and consequences of violence in the lives of child wives in Chabahar city, conducted with a qualitative methodology based on grounded theory. For this purpose, in-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted with 28 child-married girls in Chabahar city who were selected through theoretical sampling and snowball method. The analysis of the data in the framework of the three-level open, axial and selective coding system showed that gendered inequality and discrimination, women's inferiority, men's value, the culture of silence and the culture of violence play a role in the experience of child-wives in terms of violence (causal Conditions), which leads to a type of increased, double violence for them (core category); violence that operates within the framework of the family institution, the main mechanism of which are previous traditions and rules, and the perpetrators of which are men and women who were themselves the victims of the same traditions and rules that they have, now, internalized and used again against their daughters. This increased violence happens in a context where patriarchy is widespread (contextual Conditions) and due to the generalized self-deprecation among child wives (intervening Conditions), they may attempt to escape, get separated, threaten, and commit suicide (strategies), and these actions have consequences such as symbolic, physical, and sexual violence and even social isolation (consequences).

The history of the two institutions of law and morality and the relation between the two is the same as that of the life of human beings. However, this long standing relation has not been an obstacle to the existence of numerous interactions as to the type and extent of this relation, nor to achieving a sustainable agreement between the thinkers in these two fields towards regulating the relation between them. In spite of the commonalities between law and morality in the fields of objectives, and domain, they differ seriously in the same fields requiring certain mechanisms towards their realization and materialization. The main views of thinkers in regulating, the relation between these two fields are the maximal and minimal support of morality by criminal law. In other words, after recognizing the Overlapping points, and in establishing a proper relation towards solving the problem in cases of Overlapping, some thinkers hold that criminal law has a maximal support of morality considering it general and comprehensive. In contrast, another group holds a minimal support of morality by criminal law.They confine it to the inevitable cases and approve alternative mechanisms. However, we can propose an intermediate theory distinguishing the affirmation stage from verification one. In case of affirmation, they hold a maximal support of morality by law, and in case of verification they hold a type of support according to requirements and Conditions drawn by the ruler or the leader. The different mechanisms concerning the offender are also involved here. This is the very theory of Islam based on the rule saying: discretionary punishment is prescribed for any forbidden act.